With the upcoming five year anniversary of Second Life’s public existence, there’ll be plenty of editorialising and we’re not about to miss out. Below are the key achievements and challenges arising from Second Life’s first five years.
The achievements:
1. Changing the landscape
There’s no doubt that Second Life broke some serious new ground over the past five years. It was the first virtual world that gave residents enormous freedom and ownership over their creations. This alone makes the past five years a worthwhile exercise. Until then, there were gaming worlds and more restrictive social worlds like The Sims Online. Most importantly, it’s started to change the mindset of the broader population – virtual worlds are no longer just some freaky hobby experienced by a few.
2. Growth
In June 2003 there were 623 registered users of Second Life. Now there’s around 14 million registered users. Using the traditional method of a 10% active user base, that’s 1.4 million active users worldwide. That’s certainly growth, albeit not growth that matches gaming world success stories like World of Warcraft. Given some of the challenges listed below, this growth is arguably surprising and a testament to the user-driven community in Second Life.
3. Marketing
There’s no doubt that Linden Lab have had some real marketing successes, although the biggest story wasn’t created by them – Anshe Chung’s first miilion dollars . There was a deluge of new residents in late 2006 came and Linden Lab ensured the momentum continued well into 2007. The gambling, banking and ageplay bans weren’t perhaps handled as well, but overall Second Life is still perceived as a viable and attractive option in spite of its shortcomings.
4. Transparency
Linden Lab do try at times to maintain some transparency around their decisions and operations although I believe this has declined in some areas over the past year. They’re far from perfect in this regard but still a step ahead of a lot of tech companies.
The challenges:
1. Usability
This is by far and away the biggest issue facing Second Life, particularly if you live outside the USA. Linden Lab have actively touted 2008 as the year of improving the Second Life experience and there’s still a long way to go. It’s now well over a year since the word ‘soon’ was uttered in regard to SL servers based in Australia. Until this occurs there’s little likelihood of significant growth locally as the experience for most people is frustrating to say the least.
2. Relevance
With so many competitors on the horizon, SL will have a battle to maintain its market share, let alone increase it significantly. That said, the open source corse Linden Lab have taken ensures it remains the preeminent virtual worlds platform for now.
3. Interoperability
The works well underway in ensuring different worlds can directly interact but there’s an enormous amount of work still to be done. Projects like OpenSim are leading the way and the list of new grids continues to grow but OpenSim will continue to have an uphill battle against the large number of proprietary worlds underway.
4. Governance
I don’t envy Linden Lab at all as far as its role in deciding what’s acceptable or not. The numerous legal jurisdictions are enough to turn any risk manager’s hair white overnight. Things aren’t going to get any easier either as real world governments finally start to grasp the impact of virtual worlds in a range of areas – intellectual property, taxation, and health and welfare are the three more obvious ones. Linden Lab’s banking ban, ageplay intervention and gambling crackdown have had varying degrees of success – expect more intervention in coming months and years.
The overall report card
It’s hard to imagine that any company could pull off a faultless virtual world creation and expansion, so at the very least some credit needs to be given to Linden Lab, faults and all. The continued expansion of the organisation in a coherent way will make the difference between a relevant and ever-improving virtual world platform and a declining pioneer that lost its way.
Here’s to another five years of innovation and inspiration – and maybe even a more usable virtual worlds for those of us down here.
Over to you – what do you consider have been the highlights and lowlights of Second Life’s first five years?
How interesting, only the other day I was lamenting on the poor response time from Australia to the Second Life servers in the USA. The problem of anything interactive gets quite bad if the time between visualization and response gets too long. It seems I am quite lucky to get ping times below 400ms, and I understand even on good connections it is still in the 300ms range for the round trip to the USA. This is even worse when interaction with another entity because their reaction time is added to the equation.
What an interesting thought to have SL servers here in Oz so at least some regions would be more attractive to us down under. Given the interest and commitment that Telstra seems to have shown in SL they would be in an ideal position to host at least some of this exercise. They pursue value added services to their base internet service in a number of ways and have already adopted un-metered connectivity to SL surely the next step to make their “in world pond†regions even more attractive to tempt new customers and commercial interests would be the extension of running at least a few servers locally. The mix of local servers together with a responsive network must be a winner, adding value to the generally more expensive service they would like us to use.
Unless something along the lines of local servers are adopted, virtual worlds will always have a problem and will be restricted in acceptance and application.
Tanya